From 4cff104bb9984d3e97d7ec7692f392748ff33e2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sascha Wildner Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 20:51:42 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add markup for DIOCGPART. --- sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8 | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8 b/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8 index 0c20c805cc..70e49a297b 100644 --- a/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8 +++ b/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8 @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ .\" .\" @(#)disklabel.8 8.2 (Berkeley) 4/19/94 .\" $FreeBSD: src/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8,v 1.15.2.22 2003/04/17 17:56:34 trhodes Exp $ -.\" $DragonFly: src/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8,v 1.14 2007/06/18 05:13:38 dillon Exp $ +.\" $DragonFly: src/sbin/disklabel/disklabel.8,v 1.15 2007/06/23 20:51:42 swildner Exp $ .\" .Dd January 21, 2007 .Dt DISKLABEL 8 @@ -725,7 +725,9 @@ Traditional (32 bit BSD) disklabels store offsets as absolute block numbers rather than slice-relative block numbers. If .Nm -is unable to issue the DIOCGPART ioctl to get slice information it will +is unable to issue the +.Dv DIOCGPART +ioctl to get slice information it will refuse to read or write the label in raw mode. The .Fl f -- 2.41.0